Business
Canadian Software Vendor Breach Exposes Cloud Environments Across Energy Sector
Toronto, ON —
A sweeping cyberattack on a trusted Canadian software vendor has triggered widespread disruption across enterprise cloud systems, as security investigators reveal that attackers used a software update to quietly breach dozens of major clients, including key players in the energy sector.
Gridlock Solutions, based in Toronto, confirmed that its popular infrastructure analytics platform PulseCore 6.3 was compromised through a supply chain attack that injected a remote access trojan into a February software update.
The malware-laced update was downloaded by over 2,300 organizations. Once installed, it gave attackers access to cloud credentials, virtual machines, and security tokens across multiple platforms including Azure and Oracle Cloud.
“This is a textbook supply chain breach — clean until the customer deploys it,” said Greg Tsui, principal analyst at Seaboard Intelligence.
Several publicly traded companies have suspended Gridlock contracts, and the vendor’s stock dropped 17% within 24 hours of the disclosure. Multiple class-action lawsuits have already been filed, alleging negligence and lack of transparency in third-party security practices.
A spokesperson for Gridlock said the company is cooperating with federal cyber investigators and has issued a full patch along with forensic assistance for partners.
The incident has reignited debate around software supply chain security, with policy experts and CISOs urging stricter controls on how backend infrastructure software is audited and verified.
“This wasn’t ransomware. It was surgical, silent, and designed for espionage,” said Theresa Chan, CISO at Novaxa Energy. “We’re seeing trust itself being weaponized.”
Timeline of Events:
Feb 10, 2025 – Malicious code inserted into PulseCore update
Mar 3, 2025 – First anomalies detected in partner networks
Mar 27, 2025 – Gridlock acknowledges possible compromise
Apr 12, 2025 – Breach confirmed, patch issued
Impact Summary:
Affected Vendor – Gridlock Solutions
Compromised Product – PulseCore 6.3
Method of Attack – Supply chain (update-level injection)
Impacted Clients – ~2,300 enterprise customers
Estimated Downtime – 4–7 days average
Stock Price Movement – -17% in 24 hours
As scrutiny mounts, the breach has become a wake-up call for enterprise leaders relying on cloud-optimized vendor tools without complete visibility into how software updates are built, signed, and deployed. Analysts are now warning that convenience, if left unchecked, could be the single largest risk in digital supply chains.
Following the risk behind the ROI. — Leila Park
ODTN News’ Ayaan Chowdhury contributed to this report.
Business
AI-Generated “Operational Drift” Attacks Are Quietly Undermining SMB Decision-Making
A newly observed cyber technique is raising concern among analysts after several small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) reported cascading operational errors without any single system breach, malware infection, or obvious scam trigger.
The pattern, now being informally described as an “AI-induced operational drift” attack, does not rely on traditional phishing, voice impersonation, or direct financial fraud. Instead, it exploits how SMBs coordinate work across email, messaging platforms, shared documents, and scheduling tools.
In reported cases, attackers used AI-generated messages to subtly alter internal workflows over several days. Employees received routine-looking updates that appeared to come from trusted colleagues: minor deadline changes, revised procedures, updated vendor instructions, or altered approval paths.
Individually, none of the messages appeared malicious. Collectively, they introduced confusion.
According to analysts, the technique begins with AI systems trained on publicly available company information, job postings, social media content, and leaked communication styles common within specific industries. Rather than asking for money or access, the messages focus on process.
Over time, teams begin working from different assumptions. Approvals slow, tasks are duplicated, and accountability becomes unclear.
“The goal isn’t to steal immediately,” one analyst said. “It’s to destabilize decision-making until mistakes become inevitable.”
SMBs often operate with lean teams and informal communication norms. Processes evolve quickly, and documentation may lag behind reality. This makes it difficult to distinguish legitimate operational changes from manipulation especially when messages sound like they came from inside the organization.
Unlike larger enterprises, SMBs may not log or audit internal process changes with the same rigor, allowing AI-generated misinformation to persist unnoticed.
In some cases, the operational drift eventually led to missed payments, contractual breaches, or internal disputes, consequences that appeared self-inflicted rather than malicious.
Security experts warn that this technique represents a shift from event-based attacks to environmental manipulation. There is no single moment of compromise, no obvious alert, and no clean incident timeline.
“This isn’t about breaking systems,” one advisor noted. “It’s about quietly reshaping how people work until the organization breaks itself.”
Because the activity blends into normal business communication, traditional security tools often fail to detect it. The damage only becomes visible after trust and coordination have already eroded.
Analysts say defending against this class of threat will require organizations to rethink assumptions about internal communication. Verification, change management discipline, and clarity around decision authority are becoming as important as technical controls.
As AI continues to advance, experts caution that the most dangerous attacks may not arrive as alarms or outages.
They may arrive as helpful messages, reasonable suggestions, and small changes slowly steering organizations off course.
For SMBs, the challenge ahead is not just protecting systems, but protecting shared understanding itself.
Following the risk behind the ROI. — Leila Park
Business
Satellite Error Causes Widespread Banking and Transit Disruptions
November 11, 2025 — Monday’s unexpected disruption across Canada’s banking and transit systems has raised new questions about how vulnerable the country’s digital backbone has become to invisible faults, and how easily precision can unravel at scale.
For nearly six hours, payment terminals, trading systems, and commuter networks were thrown into chaos after a timing fault aboard a SkyGrid Communications satellite sent inaccurate synchronization signals to ground-based systems. The result: frozen transactions, halted trades, and locked transit gates across major cities.
From Vancouver’s transit cards to Toronto’s stock exchange, the pattern was clear — infrastructure that once seemed distinct now depends on the same unseen heartbeat pulsing from orbit. When that heartbeat falters, the whole system stumbles.
“It’s astonishing how much of modern life runs on the assumption that time is perfect,” said Dr. Amira Doucette, a cybersecurity researcher at Laurentian University. “When your clocks drift, your trust drifts. Every financial ledger, every secure transaction — it all breaks down.”
The incident began around 9:14 a.m. Monday, when banks, telecom carriers, and public transit systems started reporting timestamp errors. While SkyGrid initially described it as a “configuration anomaly,” federal investigators are not ruling out the possibility of deliberate interference.
“This wasn’t an outage you could see,” said a senior government analyst familiar with the investigation. “It was silence — and in that silence, everything froze.”
By mid-afternoon, synchronization was restored, and queued transactions began replaying. But experts say the episode exposed just how fragile Canada’s digitized economy has become. A single orbital fault managed to slow millions of micro-interactions across sectors, revealing the extent to which precision timekeeping underpins the nation’s trust infrastructure.
Some officials privately compared the event to cyber-operations seen abroad — where technical disruptions are used to mask deeper intrusions or manipulate public confidence. Though SkyGrid maintains there’s no evidence of compromise, the cascading nature of the failure has left analysts uneasy.
“This is the modern equivalent of a power outage,” said Michael Gervais, a former CSE official. “Except now, it’s not the lights that go dark — it’s the systems that decide what’s true, secure, and synchronized.”
A post-incident review is underway involving the Canadian Space Agency, Public Safety Canada, and the CSE, examining why redundant ground links failed to take over and whether the anomaly was purely technical.
For most Canadians, the disruption was temporary — a few failed payments, a stalled subway gate, a flickering stock ticker. But for those watching closely, it marked something bigger: the moment a nation glimpsed how its digital world could falter not from an attack or storm, but from a second of silence above the clouds.
Following the risk behind the ROI. — Leila Park
ODTN News’ Ayaan Chowdhury contributed to this report.
Business
Employee Speaks Out: “We Were Told to Power the Profits, Not the People.”
A siberX Power Co. employee has come forward alleging that internal recovery priorities were deliberately skewed toward restoring AI data centres and corporate clients before power was returned to critical services and residential zones.
In an interview with ODTN News, the employee, who requested anonymity for fear of retaliation described the atmosphere inside the company as “tense, chaotic, and corporate-first.”
“We were watching hospitals run on fumes while being told to focus on data clusters feeding multimillion-dollar contracts,” the source said.
“The CEO’s message was loud and clear — get the AI back online, everything else can wait.”
The leak follows an internal email from SPC’s CEO, Elise Varnholt, reportedly instructing teams to “prioritize compute capacity” and “avoid discussing client names” in public statements. The email, which surfaced on social media late Monday, has drawn heavy criticism from officials and citizens alike.
Regulators at the Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) have acknowledged awareness of the directive but declined to comment on “ongoing operational decisions” during recovery efforts.
Meanwhile, public frustration continues to mount as large sections of southern Alberta remain without full power four days after the blackout began.
Energy analysts warn that the fallout could extend beyond infrastructure — raising questions about corporate ethics, crisis leadership, and the role of AI-driven industries in critical grid planning.
“When profit dictates the order of recovery, public trust doesn’t just flicker — it burns out,” said Dr. Anika Shah, a crisis management researcher at McGill University.
ODTN.news will keep you updated on this shocking story as we uncover more of the truth behind the crisis.
Following the risk behind the ROI. — Leila Park
ODTN News’ Mira Evans & Ayaan Chowdhury contributed to this report.
-
Public7 months agoReddit Thread Over ‘Inventory Drift’ Surges as Canadians Vent Over Retail Glitches
-
Retail Watch5 months agoCalgary Small Business Hit by Sudden Payment Outage, Sparks Cybersecurity Concerns
-
Cybersecurity7 months agoCanadian Airline NorthSky Faces Cyberattack, Disrupting Online Services
-
Business6 months agoAre Canadian Companies Learning from Global Cyber Attacks? Insider Insights into the Secret Downfall of Canadian Businesses
-
Retail Watch6 months agoUnderstaffed and overwhelmed, IT teams face rising pressure as retail digitization accelerates
-
Politics5 months agoNationwide Government System Outage Paralyzes Public Services
-
Business6 months agoInsurance Without a Safety Net? Canadian Firms Face Premium Hikes Amid Cyber Liability Crisis
-
Politics7 months agoCanada, ESB Sign Digital Security Pact to Counter Global Telecom Threats
